রবিবার, ১৪ অক্টোবর, ২০১২

HBT: Nats have pieces for longer run in 2013

Yeah, that was a particularly gruesome way to lose. But that will only make the eventual payoff that much sweeter.

Of course, the Nationals aren?t guaranteed anything going forward after losing in the NLDS to the Cardinals on Friday night. Shutting down Stephen Strasburg early was a move geared towards protecting the future, but the Nationals are far from assured of finishing with the NL?s best record again next year or even making it back to the postseason.

That said, things do look pretty good:

- A top four of Strasburg, Gio Gonzalez, Jordan Zimmermann and Ross Detwiler is not only a great rotation, but it will also be a cheap one. The quarter will make about $13.5 million total in 2013.

- Bryce Harper is only going to get better, and he appeared to get more adept in center field as his rookie season went on. That means the Nationals can maintain their Michael Morse-Harper-Jayson Werth outfield and re-sign Adam LaRoche to sign play first base if they?d like. And since Morse can play first base, they also have flexibility if LaRoche leaves as a free agent and they want to replace him with a leadoff-type center fielder.

- Wilson Ramos will from his torn ACL to upgrade the catcher spot. Kurt Suzuki would make for a very expensive backup catcher unless the Nats decide to trade him, but they?re cheap enough elsewhere that they should be able to afford to keep him at $6.5 million.

The Nationals should have the payroll flexibility to target a big-name starter if they want one, whether it?s through free agency or trade. Even if LaRoche departs, the offense should be better next year with growth from Harper and more at-bats to Werth and Morse. Ian Desmond may fall off a bit, but he just turned 27 and may simply be hitting his stride.

Having the NL?s best rotation on paper didn?t do the Phillies much good this year, but the Nationals have to be considered the NL East favorites in 2013. They just won 98 games with the NL?s second-youngest team (the Triple-A Astros being the youngest), and barring a major misstep, there will be more talent coming in than exiting this winter.

Source: http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/10/13/nationals-have-all-of-the-pieces-for-a-longer-run-in-2013/related/

mary poppins john derbyshire kinkade thomas kinkade paintings easter bunny navy jet crash virginia beach isiah thomas

Recipe: Wine-Braised Short Ribs With Mashed Red Potatoes And ...

Today was cool and gray, real sweater weather. After encountering raindrops on my morning run, I decided comfort food sounded good for tonight?s dinner ? something warm and hearty with an aroma that made the house yummy for hours before it was ready.

Here?s what I made. I will be as specific as possible with measurements, but they are somewhat fluid, since I wasn?t following a recipe:

Short Ribs

  • 1? lbs. of boneless beef short ribs
  • ? cup all-purpose flour seasoned with Emeril?s Essence, smoked paprika, garlic powder, a dash of cayenne, fresh ground pepper and kosher salt.
  • 2 tablespoons of extra virgin olive oil
  • Two stalks of celery, sliced
  • ? of a sweet yellow onion, julienned
  • 1 cup of sliced white mushrooms
  • ? cut of peeled baby carrots
  • 1/3 of a parsnip, peeled and sliced (you?ll use the rest of the parsnip later)
  • 4-6 peeled cloves of garlic (leave whole ? you will transfer them to the mashed potatoes later)
  • 3 bay leaves, which you will remove and discard before serving
  • 24 oz. of beef stock
  • 12 oz. of hearty red wine (I used Cabernet)
  1. Dredge the short ribs in the seasoned flour, shaking off the excess flour. Heat the olive oil in a Dutch oven on the stovetop. When it is hot, add the dredged short ribs, searing on each side. Searing creates a crust on your meat, which will keep juices and flavor in. When all sides are browned, remove meat from the pot, setting aside.
  2. Add your broth and wine to the Dutch oven. When it comes up to temperature, deglaze the pan (scraping up all the yummy goodness left on the bottom). Add your veggies, letting them soften just a little. Add the bay leaves. Put the beef back in the pot, cover, and transfer to a 250-degree oven for four hours, turning the meat over once.
  3. Remove the meat, setting it aside to cool a little. Remove bay leaves. You can skim off excess fat by sweeping two or three lettuce leaves across the top of the broth, then discard. I took out some of the carrots (discarding them ? they?ll be mushy and overpower the other flavors), leaving a few in. Then use an immersion blender to create a gravy from the remaining broth and vegetables that are in the Dutch oven.
  4. Shred the cooled short ribs with your hands, putting beef back into the gravy, trimming and discarding excess fat. If your side dishes aren?t ready, put covered Dutch oven back into the oven at 200 degrees until everything else is ready to go.

Mashed Red Potatoes

  • Small red potatoes
  • 1/3 cup of butter
  • Cloves of garlic that braised with the short ribs
  • Fresh ground pepper and kosher salt, to taste
  • ? cup of 2% milk
  1. Boil potatoes until fork tender. Mash manually with butter, garlic, milk, salt and pepper, keeping some potato chunks intact to keep texture to the finished product.

Carmelized Veggies

  • Remainder of the parsnip that you used in the short ribs, peeled and sliced (not too thin)
  • 1 cup of peeled baby carrots, cut in half
  • 1 cup of sliced white mushrooms (don?t slice too thin)
  • 1? cups of fresh white pearl onions, peeled and halved
  • fresh ground pepper and kosher salt, to taste
  • 2 tablespoons of extra virgin olive oil
  1. Heat saut? pan with olive oil. When it is hot, add the carrots and parsnip (keep heat medium to medium high). Saute for three minutes, then add mushrooms. Saute for five more minutes, then add the onions. Continue sauteing, flipping the vegetables every couple of minutes, allowing them to caramelize. Once they are deliciously caramelized, season to taste with salt and pepper.

Here?s how the finished meal looked, all plated and ready to eat!

?

?

Lisa

Lisa Maria Boyles is a mother, a writer and a runner who loves all things food and news related. She is probably running, eating and mothering at a place near you now. You can e-mail her at lisa@thefullmoxie.com.

More Posts ? Website

Follow Me:
TwitterFacebook

Source: http://thefullmoxie.com/2012/10/13/recipe-wine-braised-short-ribs-with-mashed-red-potatoes-and-carmelized-veggies/

oscar winners the artist sacha baron cohen oscars the old curiosity shop jane russell meryl streep martin scorsese

Was Biden too mean in the veep debate for ?Iowa nice? voters?

NEWTON, Iowa ? Right under the picture of Marilyn Monroe, the muted television set at the Newton Family Restaurant was tuned to the Fox News recap of the vice-presidential debate as the on-screen headline blared, ?The Gloves Are Off.? But chatting with the 7 a.m. Friday breakfast crowd, many of them night-shift workers and retirees, it was hard to find anyone who actually watched the bare-knuckle brawl between Joe Biden and Paul Ryan.

That?s not entirely true, because Joyce Gilbreaith, a retiree sharing sausage patties and hash-brown potatoes with her husband Bill, admitted to me: ?I watched about 10 minutes of it and then turned it off. I got sleepy. I don?t like any debates like that ? they?re so unfriendly.?

Heidi Rodgers caught the beginning of it before she had to leave for her job as an overnight customer service manager at Walmart. ?Biden was laughing at Ryan,? she said. ?Something about malarkey. It didn?t seem like Biden was taking it seriously.?

Morning-after conversations in this working-class town (population: 15,000) about 35 miles east of Des Moines illustrate the difficulty of instantly scoring debates. What often gets through to voters are the snippets and sound bites rather than the full Debate Night in America viewing experience. Voters like Rodgers, a committed Barack Obama Democrat, are also adept at separating their judgments as TV critics from their political allegiance.

At Uncle Nancy?s Coffee House, on the town square right across the street from the 1911 Jasper County Courthouse, I entered just in time to hear a derisive crack about Biden from a woman in her late 60s: ?I thought it was disrespectful. Joe with all that malarkey business.?

The woman, who would not reveal her name, is part of a floating Newton coffee klatch in which one of the cardinal rules is ?never talk politics.? But Biden was so exasperating to this loyal Republican that she violated protocol not knowing that a reporter was sitting nearby.

For a century, Newton was synonymous with Maytag, until 2006 when the washing-machine company was acquired by Whirlpool. The 1,900-worker plant was soon closed, with many of the jobs shipped to Mexico. But this is an area where blue-collar anger does not automatically translate into Democratic votes. Jasper County closely mirrored the statewide vote in both 2008 (Obama romped home with 54 percent and 53 percent in the county) and 2010 (Republican Terry Branstad won the governorship in a landslide over the Democratic incumbent, Chet Culver).

Carl Repp, a Maytag retiree in his early 60s, expressed exaggerated remorse to his friends at Uncle Nancy?s for choosing the tightly fought VP debate over the tightly fought Thursday night NFL game (won by the Titans over the Steelers 26-23).

?I thought it was a good debate,? Repp said. ?I?m a Democrat. I thought Joe did a great job, but I wish that he didn?t interrupt so much.?

Long personal observation, dating back to the 1980 Republican caucuses, suggests that Iowans are nicer than voters in most states. While this is not a statistically verifiable conclusion, it would partly explain the morning-after obsession with Biden?s debate demeanor. Another theory, of course, is that Biden?s debate dominance may have been self-defeating.

Most mornings around 8 a.m., Repp shares coffee with Randy Wagner, another Maytag retiree, and Curt Brass, a police officer. Wagner is a disgruntled Democrat who jokes that he?s leaning towards Alfred E. Neuman, the Mad magazine icon, for president. But, in truth, Wagner admitted that he almost certainly will be voting for Obama.

?I don?t like Mitt Romney and what he stands for,? Wagner said. But while the Democrats can get Wagner?s vote, they can?t inspire him to watch the debates.

The 39-year-old Brass, who served two tours of duty with the Marines in Iraq, is part of that rare species of undecided voters who are eagerly sought by political campaigns and wayward reporters. And, yes, Brass watched every minute of the VP debate.

?I thought Ryan held his own ? and I wanted to see how he would do up against the more experienced Biden,? Brass said. ?I thought that Biden was a bit theatrical with his scowling and his smirking and his laughter.?

Despite the glib stereotypes about the politics of police officers and Marines, Brass voted for Obama in 2008. But he said, ?I?ve been disappointed with him because I don?t see how the economy is changing.?

On the other hand, Brass sees the Republicans as equally culpable because of their obstinate opposition in Congress. Brass also cynically noted that Romney had signed gun-control legislation as Massachusetts governor but became a passionate supporter of the National Rifle Association once he began running for president.

The vice-presidential debate, for all its entertainment value, did little to clarify the presidential race for Brass, although he did say, ?I like Biden because even when he puts his foot in his mouth, he means it.?

Trying to divine his leanings, I asked Brass the age-old if-the-election-were-held-today question.

?If the election were held today,? he replied, ?I?d write in Curt Brass.?

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/was-biden-too-mean-in-the-veep-debate-for-%E2%80%98iowa-nice%E2%80%99-voters--.html

joran van der sloot honey badger critics choice awards 2012 colbert president huntingtons disease rob the firm

Researcher helps make Sudoku puzzles less puzzling

Friday, October 12, 2012

For anyone who has ever struggled while attempting to solve a Sudoku puzzle, University of Notre Dame researcher Zoltan Toroczkai and Notre Dame postdoctoral researcher Maria Ercsey-Ravaz are riding to the rescue. They can not only explain why some Sudoku puzzles are harder than others, they have also developed a mathematical algorithm that solves Sudoku puzzles very quickly, without any guessing or backtracking.

Toroczkai and Ravaz of Romania's Babes-Boylai University began studying Sudoku as part of their research into the theory of optimization and computational complexity. They note that most Sudoku enthusiasts use what is known as a "brute force" system to solve problems, combined with a good deal of guessing. Brute force systems essentially deploy all possible combinations of numbers in a Sudoku puzzle until the correct answer is found. While the method is successful, it is also time consuming.

Instead, Toroczkai and Ercsey-Ravaz have proposed a universal analog algorithm which is completely deterministic (no guessing or exhaustive searching) but which always arrives at the correct solution to a problem and does so much quicker.

The researchers also discovered that the time it took to solve a problem with their analog algorithm correlated with the difficulty of the problem as rated by human solvers. This led them to develop a ranking scale for problem or puzzle difficulty. The scale runs from 1 through 4 and it matches up nicely with the "Easy" through

"Hard" to "Ultra-Hard" classification currently applied to Sudoku puzzles. A puzzle with a rating of 2 takes, on average, 10 times as long to solve than one with rating of 1. According to this system, the hardest known puzzle so far has a rating of 3.6 and it is not known if there are even harder puzzles out there.

"I had not been interested in Sudoku until we started working on the much more general class of 'Boolean satisfiability problems," Toroczkai said. "Since Sudoku is a part of this class, it seemed like a good testbed for our solver, so I familiarized myself with it. To me, and to a number of researchers studying such problems, a fascinating question is how far can us humans go in solving Sudoku puzzles deterministically, without backtracking, that is without making a choice at random, then seeing where that leads to and if it fails, restarting. Our analog solver is deterministic ? there are no random choices or backtracks made during the dynamics." Toroczkai and Ercsey-Ravasz feel that their analog algorithm can potentially be applied to a wide variety of problems in industry, computer science and computational biology.

The research experience has also made Toroczkai a devotee of Sudoku puzzles.

"Both my wife and I have several Sudoku apps on our iPhones and we must have played thousands of times, racing to get the shortest completion times on all levels," he said. "She often sees combinations of patterns that I completely miss. I have to deduce them. Without paper and pencil to jot down possibilities, it becomes impossible for me to solve many of the puzzles that our solver categorizes as hard or ultra-hard." Toroczkai's and Ercsey-Ravasv's methodology was first published in the journal Nature Physics and its application to Sudoku, appears in the Oct. 11 edition of the journal Nature Scientific Reports.

###

University of Notre Dame: http://www.nd.edu

Thanks to University of Notre Dame for this article.

This press release was posted to serve as a topic for discussion. Please comment below. We try our best to only post press releases that are associated with peer reviewed scientific literature. Critical discussions of the research are appreciated. If you need help finding a link to the original article, please contact us on twitter or via e-mail.

This press release has been viewed 73 time(s).

Source: http://www.labspaces.net/124442/Researcher_helps_make_Sudoku_puzzles_less_puzzling

the heart attack grill joe kennedy iii joseph kennedy iii ghost hunters lightsquared david lee honduras prison fire

Western defense budget cuts may be unstoppable

Whether or not America's politicians can find a way to sidestep the brutal automatic military cuts of sequestration, the era of rising Western spending on weapons and wars is over.

That reality increasingly is challenging major arms manufacturers, spurring them to look for new markets, cost cuts and mergers. It is also confronting policymakers with difficult political and strategic choices as new rivals, particularly China, spend more on their armed forces.

U.S. military spending still dwarfs that of other countries - the equivalent of the next 13 nations' spending by some estimates - but the global military balance is clearly shifting. With European states already cutting, the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies this year reported that Asian military spending outstripped Europe's for the first time in several centuries.

U.S. lawmakers may well avoid or delay automatic across-the-board budget cuts that would hit the military hard and are set to begin on January 2 if there is no deal on deficit reduction. But few see the United States avoiding military budget cuts in the next few years given that the government's debt burden has now surged above $16 trillion and continues to rise.

Republican presidential challenger Mitt Romney has pledged to increase Pentagon spending, particularly on the Navy. But he could find himself struggling to keep that promise if he defeats President Barack Obama next month.

U.S. strategic options may soon be defined more by what Washington can afford than by what it believes it needs.

"For the first time in our history, we may be facing a moment where we really do not have the money to do exactly what it is that the experts or the policy advisers ... suggest is the right thing," said Todd Harrison, senior fellow at the Center on Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. "Budget cuts could end up determining the shape of U.S. policy."

'Those days are over'
That would be a far cry from the last decade, when military cost control was often of secondary importance as the United States waged wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"Whenever we found a problem, we cauterized it with cash," Undersecretary of Defense for Industrial Policy Brett Lambert told a meeting of Reuters defense and aerospace reporters last month. "Those days are over."

That is a reality some industry executives have quietly conceded. They have been pinning their hopes for growth on more sales to civilian government agencies and emerging states - an approach that has prompted viciously competitive battles for business with India, Brazil and the Gulf.

Attempts to fold Britain's premier defense firm BAE into its larger European rival EADS were in part an acknowledgement of shrinking markets - even if differences between Britain, France and Germany ultimately killed the deal.

Meanwhile, U.S. defense firms have already begun laying off staff and closing facilities to reflect lower demand and the $487 billion in cuts already planned for the next decade.

U.S. defense spending in 2012 will total $612 billion, down slightly from 2010's $691 billion peak as operational contingency spending specifically earmarked for the Iraqi and Afghan wars fell, according to the Pentagon.

The core Pentagon budget ? with the cost of the wars excluded ? is now $531 billion. As things stand, defense takes up around 20 percent of the entire federal budget, roughly the same as Social Security and massively outstripping federal spending on transportation, education and science.

But overall U.S. military spending is now expected to drop for the first time in more than a decade, with the Pentagon proposing a base budget of $525 billion and war spending of just over $88 billion in the fiscal year that began October 1. When inflation is taken into account, it has been falling since 2010.

The sequestration cuts would strip just over 11 percent from Pentagon spending. While that might not seem devastating, the pain would be shared indiscriminately - including in areas seen as increasingly vital, such as special operations and cyber warfare.

Only on Thursday, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta warned that unnamed foreign actors were targeting U.S. computer control systems that operate chemical, electricity and water plants, as well as transportation.

If the budget cuts go through as planned, more than 1 million jobs could be lost at U.S. weapons plants and in the surrounding communities, according to some estimates. Earlier this year, Lockheed Martin warned it might be forced to make 10 percent of its workforce redundant.

But the campaign to stop sequestration, some suspect, could simply be the start of a much larger battle.

Defense companies push back
It's now a mantra for top Pentagon officials and the wider defense sector that cuts beyond the $487 billion already planned would make nonsense of Washington's entire national security strategy, which was unveiled only last February.

"Defense has already been cut through the muscle and we are now into the bone," said Marion Blakey, chief executive of the Aerospace Industries Association (AIA), pointing to 50 "significant sized" projects the Pentagon says it has already canceled. "I wish we lived in a safer world, but we don't."

One of the three cardboard-mounted cartoons she often carries to meetings delivers a blunt message to politicians.

"Defense cuts equal job losses" reads one, a 1930s-style pen and ink image of a line of muscular defense workers marching directly into a polling booth. "Workers return the favor."

Not everyone agrees. Opinion pollsters say defense often tops the list of areas where the public would like to see cuts, while fatigue over the last decade's wars makes new overseas commitments hard to sell.

Some experts argue further efficiencies and cuts are more than possible. They suggest buying more flexible systems and using special forces, drones and new technology to replace more expensive traditional equipment.

"The companies will put up a fight (against cuts)," said former U.S. Navy Secretary Richard Danzig, now chairman of the Center for a New American Security think tank. "But as long as the civilian and military leadership stick together, I don't think the companies will win."

In Washington, a city full of defense lobbyists and where major firms help fund many private foundations that help draft policy, there is no shortage of authorities pointing to potential threats.

China almost invariably tops the list, with its military spending perhaps only a fifth of that of the United States but by some estimates doubling every five years. Long-standing troublespots such as the Middle East also have not gone away.

The argument from the AIA and others, however, goes well beyond the strategic - essentially saying that defense projects themselves are effectively a common good, driving economic activity and innovation at a difficult time.

Some are openly skeptical, even within the industry.

"We shouldn't build a carrier because it creates jobs," said Mike Petters, chief executive of shipbuilder Huntington Ingalls, the largest employer in several U.S. states including Virginia, whose votes could help decide the November 6 presidential election. "We should do it because we decide we need an aircraft carrier."

'Yet another switch'
Critics say European military purchases are already often dictated less by strategy than by the conflicting needs to reduce deficits while supporting "national champion" defense firms like Britain's BAE or Italy's Finmeccanica.

When Britain's newly elected government began its strategic defense review in 2010, it found itself severely limited by the cost of cancelling expensive pre-agreed contracts such as the purchase of two new aircraft carriers.

Already over budget, costs surged further this year after the government changed its mind twice on whether to fit one of the ships with catapults for conventional aircraft or to simply rely on vertical-takeoff jets.

One key reason costs escalate so fast, defense executives argue, has always been the shifting and excessively complex demands from government and military buyers.

"The war fighter almost always wants to add yet another switch," said Petters at Huntington Ingalls. "I think it's our greatest challenge as an industry."

Former Lockheed chief executive Norm Augustine famously predicted in 1984 that by the middle of the 21st century, a single fighter aircraft could be so expensive that the U.S. Air Force and Navy might only be able to afford a single airframe that they would share between them on alternate days.

Now, with coffers emptying, governments may have no choice but to ask themselves whether something less than "best at all costs" could get the job done.

"If you're chasing after a pirate with a Kalashnikov in a small boat, you don't necessarily need to do it with a multi-million dollar destroyer," British Chief of the Defense Staff David Richards told a Washington audience in May.

Additional reporting by Reuters' Marcus Stern, Jim Wolf and Andrea Shalal-Esa.

(c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2012. Check for restrictions at: http://about.reuters.com/fulllegal.asp

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/49404306/

Prince Harry Vegas powerball Melky Cabrera Mayim Bialik Rich Kids of Instagram felix hernandez Ron Palillo

শনিবার, ১৩ অক্টোবর, ২০১২

Self Improvement: Tips And Tricks For A Better You

TIP! Compliment other people. When you make an effort to treat others kindly, it becomes easier to think of yourself in kinder terms.

Are you working on improving your skills to improve your life? If you are ready to get started on a focused personal development campaign, the tips below will be a big help.

TIP! Challenge yourself to grow daily. Always work towards making improvements.

Find books that inspire you. Some people may look to a religious text, while others might look for inspiring quotes. By keeping something around that you can refer to for encouragement, you will be better able to handle all that life throws at you.

TIP! When you?re looking for employment, having a degree is often essential. It typically does not matter what school that degree came from though.

Only you can decide that you are ready for and want change. Unless you understand and accept the fact that it will require change, personal growth will be almost impossible for you to achieve.

TIP! Pinpoint what is getting in the way of your success. Most people don?t know where to start.

Stay organized and keep up with how you are doing. You can stay on track if you tackle small things first. You can watch your progress through daily planners, or, you can devote a whole journal specifically focused on your personal development targets.

TIP! Are you a heavy alcohol drinker? Are you a smoker, or do you regularly engage in something that is bad for you? Our body is sacred, and we should respect it and treat it as so. You can improve your life by replacing bad habits with good ones.

Always be on the look out for a challenge. These new challenges can create many possibilities. Additionally, you will understand your limits and improve your abilities. It is completely likely that you can set a new standard from accomplishing something before others have. Look for your own thing to do, instead of accomplishing things people have already done.

TIP! When you want to improve yourself, you need goals. Don?t just think about them, either; write them down.

Maximize your time for self improvement to help you get more done. The easy way to do this is to simply take more breaks during your work day. Although this seems counterproductive, taking regular breaks is good because it gives you the chance to recharge your mind, so when you resume work, you?ll be able to get more done.

TIP! If you are in the process of self development, it can be a blow to fail but keep going. But, failure doesn?t have to be something bad if you can learn from it and gain experience from it.

Declaring lowliness is a crucial step in advancing in personal development. You will want to learn all you can, once you realize that you have only scratched the surface of all there is to be known. Once you realize this, you will be able to understand and improve upon yourself.

TIP! Try to find a book or article that encourages or uplifts you. This could be a holy text for some people.

The people in your life should have similar interests. This will reinforce the aspects of your personality that you are seeking to develop, while allowing you to distance yourself from toxic individuals in your life.

TIP! Humility is a key factor in personal development. Realizing your place in the big scheme of things is freeing.

Weight loss should not be the only reason to exercise. There are tons of reasons to exercise. Exercise stimulates the production of substances in your body that help calm you.

TIP! Regardless of your surroundings, you should be ready to record ideas when they come to mind. You could for instance carry a small notebook with you, or use an app on your phone.

Life should be approached with wisdom and modesty. There are lessons to be learned from everyday situations; learn to accept the things you have no control over in your life. Humility can help you concentrate on achieving things that are within your reach. Use wisdom to learn from the past and do better in your future.

TIP! Leaders are strong, but not boastful or conceited. You should lecture, but do it softly, and keep in mind that you have to know servitude to be able to lead.

Knowing what you can get out of your life is a major key to your self improvement. One of the things that will make the biggest difference in your outlook is having long-term goals.

TIP! Establish reachable goals to increase your feeling of accomplishment and satisfaction in life. Once you have identified your own weaknesses, you can begin to improve upon them.

You can help yourself have a better life, and it really isn?t as scary or complicated as you may have thought. With you taking charge, consider the amazing benefits you?ll receive, including increasing your overall happiness and health

http://coreyotten.com/empowerblog

Tags: personal development

Source: http://coreyotten.com/self-improvement-tips-and-tricks-for-a-better-you.html

lindsay lohan’s playboy cover leaked online va tech shooting 2011 coriolanus coriolanus v tech top model all stars americas next top model

Dems in coal states diverge on Obama policies

FILE - In this Nov. 2, 2010 file photo, West Virginia Republican Senate candidate John Raese is seen in Morgantown, W.Va. Friends of coal are certain they know the enemy. They point to President Barack Obama and his Environmental Protection Agency, arguing that the administration?s new clean air rules dealt a devastating blow to a multibillion-dollar industry that has been the lifeblood of Appalachia for generations. The standards imposed earlier this year tightened limits on existing coal powered-plant emissions; agency guidelines on restricting greenhouse gases could affect new plants as early as 2013. (AP Photo/Steve Helber, File)

FILE - In this Nov. 2, 2010 file photo, West Virginia Republican Senate candidate John Raese is seen in Morgantown, W.Va. Friends of coal are certain they know the enemy. They point to President Barack Obama and his Environmental Protection Agency, arguing that the administration?s new clean air rules dealt a devastating blow to a multibillion-dollar industry that has been the lifeblood of Appalachia for generations. The standards imposed earlier this year tightened limits on existing coal powered-plant emissions; agency guidelines on restricting greenhouse gases could affect new plants as early as 2013. (AP Photo/Steve Helber, File)

FILE - In this Sept. 1, 2012 file photo, Ohio Republican Senate candidate Josh Mandel speaks at a campaign rally in Cincinnati. Friends of coal are certain they know the enemy. They point to President Barack Obama and his Environmental Protection Agency, arguing that the administration?s new clean air rules dealt a devastating blow to a multibillion-dollar industry that has been the lifeblood of Appalachia for generations. The standards imposed earlier this year tightened limits on existing coal powered-plant emissions; agency guidelines on restricting greenhouse gases could affect new plants as early as 2013. (AP Photo/Al Behrman, File)

FILE - In this Dec. 17, 2011 file photo, Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va. speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington. Friends of coal are certain they know the enemy. They point to President Barack Obama and his Environmental Protection Agency, arguing that the administration?s new clean air rules dealt a devastating blow to a multibillion-dollar industry that has been the lifeblood of Appalachia for generations. The standards imposed earlier this year tightened limits on existing coal powered-plant emissions; agency guidelines on restricting greenhouse gases could affect new plants as early as 2013. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

FILE - In this March 30, 2011 file photo, Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington. Friends of coal are certain they know the enemy. They point to President Barack Obama and his Environmental Protection Agency, arguing that the administration?s new clean air rules dealt a devastating blow to a multibillion-dollar industry that has been the lifeblood of Appalachia for generations. The standards imposed earlier this year tightened limits on existing coal powered-plant emissions; agency guidelines on restricting greenhouse gases could affect new plants as early as 2013. (AP Photo/Harry Hamburg, File)

(AP) ? Friends of coal are certain they know the enemy.

They fault President Barack Obama and his Environmental Protection Agency for new clean air rules they deride as a devastating blow to a multibillion-dollar industry that has been the lifeblood of Appalachia for generations. The agency standards imposed earlier this year tightened limits on existing coal powered-plant emissions while guidelines on restricting greenhouse gases could affect new plants as early as 2013.

Along the rolling hills of this tiny Ohio town ? population just over 5,100 ? campaign signs for judges, state legislators and county officials crowd the neat lawns. As the road curves toward the interstate, one banner overshadows them all: "End the war on coal. Fire Obama."

Barb Swan, who runs Swan's Sport Shop on West Main Street, is a registered Democrat and daughter of a coal miner. She won't be voting for Obama and she won't back Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown, whom she contends puts the president's energy policies over the interests of his constituents.

"If you have a district that's coal, you fight for coal," argued the 67-year-old Swan.

Obama's moves on clean air and fossil fuels have complicated the lives of Democrats in coal-rich states that count on mining for jobs and economic growth, with incumbents and candidates adopting drastically different strategies to ensure their own political survival.

In West Virginia, where the president is wildly unpopular, Sen. Joe Manchin boasts about his unyielding opposition to the EPA and his confrontations with the administration. In his latest campaign ad, Manchin ? rifle in hand ? alludes to a previous commercial in which he shoots Obama's bill to cap greenhouse gases from coal-burning power plants. The senator says the state has enough coal and natural gas to provide energy and jobs for decades, and "I'll take on anyone who tries to stop us."

In Republican-leaning Indiana, Democratic Senate candidate Joe Donnelly ignored Obama's objections and embraced a House GOP bill to undo the EPA rules. In swing state Ohio, Brown espouses an all-of-the-above energy policy similar to Obama's and dismisses claims of a "war on coal" as Republican talking points.

The White House, for its part, insists that the criticism of its record on coal is unfounded.

"The president has made clear that coal has an important role to play in our energy economy today and it will in the future, which is why this administration has worked to make sure that moving forward we can continue to rely on a broad range of domestic energy sources from oil and gas, to wind and solar, to nuclear, as well as clean coal," said Clark Stevens, a White House spokesman.

The administration points to a 31 percent increase in coal exports and greater flexibility in enforcing the new standards. The economic prospects for coal, Stevens said, "reflect the independent, financial decisions that utilities are making in response to the increase in cheap, abundant natural gas."

Coal's woes do extend far beyond the new EPA rules.

Natural gas is plentiful, less expensive and more environmentally friendly. A rush is on in the same Appalachian towns where coal has been king to claim natural gas mineral rights in the region's Marcellus and Utica shale reserves. Out-of-town lawyers have descended upon the courthouse in the Belmont County seat to pour over decades-old deeds and titles, some dating to the late 1800s, as they figure out which families should get checks.

"The hallways are filled," said Kent Moore, the former Republican Party chairman in Belmont. "They're moving from one county to another."

In 2011, U.S. production of natural gas surpassed coal production for the first time in 20 years, according to the government's Energy Information Administration.

China's economic slowdown and the diminishing demand for the top-grade coal to make steel has affected coal in the eastern United States. Other countries, such as Brazil, are moving ahead with their production.

"It's a perfect storm of bad things that can happen," said Carol L. Raulston, a spokeswoman for the National Mining Association.

But listen to an Obama campaign ad on country radio in eastern Ohio, and coal and natural gas are doing just fine. The spot says coal production is up 7 percent and coal jobs have increased 10 percent during Obama's tenure. Natural gas production is at an all-time high.

His campaign contends that Obama would be better for coal than rival Mitt Romney, and the commercial highlights the Republican saying in 2003 that he wouldn't back a coal-fired plant "that kills people."

Romney accuses Obama of imposing regulations that would "bankrupt" the coal industry. He promises that the United States will become energy independent by 2020 through more aggressive exploitation of domestic oil, gas, coal and other natural resources. The Republican also vows to pursue measured reforms of environmental laws and regulations without impeding jobs or industries.

Anti-Obama commercials on the radio in Ohio use the president's 2008 remark that if someone wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can go ahead, but "it's just that it will bankrupt them." The tagline says "let's cap Obama and trade him for Mitt Romney."

The United Mine Workers of America, which endorsed Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1936, John F. Kennedy in 1960 and Obama in 2008, has declined to back a presidential candidate this year, saying it doesn't see either Obama or Romney offering the best opportunities for its members.

___

For Manchin, support for coal is personal, business and political commonsense.

In the early morning of Nov. 20, 1968, an explosion at the Mountaineer Coal Co. mine in Farmington, W.Va., killed 78 miners. Among the dead were Manchin's uncle, John Gouzd, and high school friends.

In the years since, Manchin owes some of his wealth to Enersystems Inc., a coal brokerage firm he once helped operate. Manchin's financial disclosure forms in 2009 and 2010 showed operating income of more than $1.7 million.

West Virginia is the second-largest coal producing state behind Wyoming and its mines and plants add up to more than 21,000 underground and surface jobs, according to the Energy Department. Coal mined in Appalachia generates electricity, is shipped overseas and is used in metal production.

Manchin has repeatedly challenged the Obama administration over coal. In 2010, as West Virginia governor, he sued the EPA over its crackdown on mountaintop mining.

"Enough is enough," Manchin said this past June. "The people of West Virginia are tired of the EPA's overreach, and I will do everything in my power to rein in the EPA ? and any agency that oversteps its authority."

The Democrat has consistently voted with Republicans for legislation to roll back EPA rules.

Yet, in the one and only Senate campaign debate earlier this month, Manchin repeatedly had to defend himself against criticism from Republican rival and businessman John Raese, who tied the Democrat to Obama.

"Who controls the environmental rules, that's the executive branch and that's handled by his quarterback, Barack Obama," said Raese, delivering his rhetorical stabs with the smooth voice of a late-night deejay on one of his radio stations. "Joe's heart ... is in the right place. I'm not saying it's not. I'm just saying the team that he's on has no interest at all in helping West Virginia. The only interest they have is getting us out of the fossil fuel business."

Manchin insisted he would fight for coal, no matter what.

"The government should be your partner. It shouldn't be your adversary," he said on the debate stage at Shepherd University in Shepherdstown, W.Va. "It should be your ally and that's what we don't have in Washington and that's what I've been working for. And I'll work with whoever the president. I worked when President Bush was there. I worked with President Obama. I will work with the next president."

West Virginia voters are expected to give Manchin a full six-year term in November. Obama lost the state in 2008 by 13 percentage points and in this year's Democratic primary in May, a convicted felon in Texas got 40 percent of the vote to the president's 60 percent, a fresh reminder of Obama's unpopularity in the state. Romney is expected to handily win West Virginia's five electoral votes next month.

___

In Ohio, coal is responsible for some 3,000 underground and surface jobs, and generates more than 87 percent of the state's electricity. Ohio is seventh in the nation in coal reserves with 23.7 billion short tons and Belmont County is the leading coal producer in the state, churning out 760 million tons since 1816, according to the Ohio Coal Association.

Power plants that burn coal produce more than 90 times as much sulfur dioxide, five times as much nitrogen oxide and twice as much carbon dioxide as those that run on natural gas, according to the Government Accountability Office, the regulatory arm of Congress. Sulfur dioxide causes acid rain; nitrogen oxides cause smog; and carbon dioxide is a so-called greenhouse gas that traps heat in the atmosphere.

The EPA tightened limits on power-plant emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide, and placed new limits on mercury, a poison found in coal. That step will force some of the dirtiest and oldest coal plants to close.

Even more disconcerting for the industry is the EPA guidelines that could limit greenhouse gas emissions from new power plants as early as next year.

In Ohio, Brown faces a challenge from Republican Josh Mandel, who at a recent campaign stop eagerly compared the Ohio Democrat's record on coal and energy to Manchin's. He linked Brown to the president.

"Obama is the general in the war on coal and Sherrod Brown is his lieutenant," Mandel said.

Brown defended his record in a brief interview.

"My record on energy is broad," he said. "I think as the president said, 'You look everywhere.' You start by taking away the tax breaks for the oil industry. You hear these Republicans say the president is picking winners and losers on energy and they insist on subsidizing oil, and there's no rhyme or reason to subsidize oil."

Brown wears a canary in a cage lapel pin, which he says "symbolizes to me the role of government in peoples' lives to make things better whether it's mine safety or Medicare or Social Security."

But Mike Carey, chairman of the Ohio Coal Association, doesn't see Brown as a friend of coal.

"You can have very safe miners, but if they can't mine coal, maybe they're going to be selling canaries because they're not going to be mining coal," Carey said.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2012-10-12-US-Coal-Politics/id-34ab4beb405c4a58a0448a9a25bffe48

ufc on fox 2 supercross christina aguilera etta james funeral sundance film festival victoria azarenka the flintstones etta james